Re-Imagining Post Industrial Cities

August 27th, 2010

In July I traveled to Cleveland to conduct a workshop on design and branding in community development at the GLUE (Great Lakes Urban Exchange) conference. GLUE’s Sarah Szurpicki is spearheading a rust belt renaissance by connecting people who want to revitalize post industrial cities. GLUE collaborated with ReImagining Cleveland, a group of organizations implementing solutions for vacant land and strategies for sustainable land reuse, to develop innovative ideas to re-imagine a more sustainable Cleveland. The conference functioned as a weekend think tank to iterate project ideas about putting vacant land to socially and environmentally responsible use.

The conference was kicked off by Reimagining Cleveland’s Bobbi Reichtell of Neighborhood Progress and Terry Schwarz of the Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative. They reported that Cleveland is adding an astonishing 100 to 150 acres of vacant land each year. This poses a major problem, decreasing property values and the overall quality of life for residents. In an effort to find the best solutions, ReImagining Cleveland is running 56 projects on a total of 120 land lots. These organizations and communities have set out to solve the immense problem of shrinking budgets but growing land.

Cleveland has been defined as a post industrial city, overwhelmed with social and environmental problems—especially since the subprime mortgage crisis—and it’s struggling to lift itself up in the best way possible. I was inspired by the creative revival taking over the city; I met many young entrepreneurs working to realize their version of a new Cleveland. A low cost of living makes their ideas much more realistic than they would be here in New York. At the conference I met many young Clevelanders who’ve recently moved back home to recreate their lives and the city together.

There are so many projects with the ability to scale up and pose as good models for other urban communities, but here are a few particularly notable ones:

We visited Urban Growth Farms in the west side of Cleveland and spoke with Peter McDermott & Virginia Houston. Urban Growth is a team of young farmers who believe in good food, good cities, and good soil. They created a small urban market garden that sells to a variety of local farmers markets. They plan to expand their lot next year as vacant land pops up nearby. They working to find the sweet spot of profitability, ecological sustainability, and community health.

The Cleveland Colectivo is a member group of Clevelanders that invests in community by collective giving. To be a voting member and part of choosing which projects to support they ask for a donation of $400 dollars annually. They dole out small grants for neighborhood projects from $500 to $5,000 dollars. One of their grantees is Larchmont PorchFest where over 20 neighborhood porches transform into stages for music performances.

Passport Project is an arts education center that provides educational experiences to support communities and encourage mutual respect in culturally diverse places. A community arts center holds art classes and music and dance performances from all around the world.

Zerolandfill (a project of BeeDance) The organization up-cycles materials used by the creative community, like fabric, tiles, and rubber flooring samples to develop community jobs projects and classroom art initiatives.

4food: 4 people, planet, profit

August 18th, 2010

Some members of New York’s food world, social media wing, and environmental/corporate responsibility advocates are atwitter about a new burger joint hitting Midtown, near Bryant Park. Called 4food (not sure how we feel about that name) the restaurant is like a poppy mash-up of so many initiatives the social impact team cheers.


The 4food logo

The food will be organic and local whenever possible, and the environmentally sound construction houses a giant composter to consume all that’s thrown away. The restaurant will rely on web technology for menus, ordering (which you can do via iPads in the store), and more, to reduce waste and provide more information to customers making decisions about their health. Employees are being hired through NYC’s Displaced Worker program.

The company is using social media (and has been since last year) to engage its future customers in generating ideas on how to “de-junk” NYC. (The big idea is to impact the healthfulness of the fast food genre.) Naturally, the store is outfitted with a jumbotron streaming real-time, relevant Twitter and Foursquare updates. 4food wants social media savvy customers who will spread the word about the spot—so they won’t need a huge advertising budget. In fact, you’ll be able to customize your own burger online, market it, and earn $0.25 every time someone else orders it.

And if all of that doesn’t make you want to tell someone about 4food, maybe the actual food will: the burgers are donut-shaped, and available in beef, lamb, turkey, veg, pork, salmon, and egg versions. You then choose a vegetable to fill the whole (the point being to make the burger healthier) as well as its bun and other toppings. Furthermore, it’s a self-identified fast food restaurant where nothing is fried.

We social impact enthusiasts like to talk about the triple bottom line: people, planet, and profit. Some reporting on 4food say that the restaurant hasn’t exactly finalized the plan for the last of those three. A three-story, 150-seat restaurant using top technology and paying Manhattan rent probably can’t solve the profitability conundrum solely by using social media in lieu of an advertising budget. That doesn’t mean they aren’t going at it aggressively: word has it that the restaurant will open a store a month for the first few months, and eventually over ten will exist in Manhattan.

Lest you worry there aren’t capable people behind this incredibly ambition operation, take a look at the list of founding partners (from the 4food website):

“Partners in 4food include the founders Adam Kidron and Michael Shuman; Bill Niman the founder of Niman Ranch, the largest purveyor of natural meats in the US with revenues of over $100 million; Dr. Woodson Merrill, founder of the Beth Israel Center for Integrated Medicine and a leading authority on wellness and nutrition; and Ed Winter, Chairman of Omnicom’s “Brand Activation” Agency, Tracy Locke, and one of the foremost experts on marketing to young people in the US.”

Opening day is September 7, 2010, and Kidron is predicting they’ll see 400 customers. We think the Channelise team will be among them!

Nonprofits play Foursquare, too

July 19th, 2010

The Channelise team has some exciting nonprofit ventures coming up. On Social Media Day (June 30th), we were lucky enough to attend NTEN’s “Who’s Your Mayor? (Exploring Nonprofits + Foursquare)” talk about the benefits to .orgs of Foursquare.

To those uninitiated with the social web’s most talked-about, location-based platform for telling your friends what you’re doing and where in real time, the benefit to nonprofits aren’t obvious. Users “check in” to restaurants, bars, retail stores and more, earning points in the weekly tally, becoming “mayor” if they’ve checked in the most, and sometimes they’re alerted to nearby deals offered by businesses seeking to leverage the application.




Nonprofits play the game




True, different types of nonprofits stand to gain more or less from Foursquare. For example, the American Society of Association Executives in downtown Washington, DC is unlikely to have visitors beyond employees and, assumedly, the occasional association executive. But organizations like the Brooklyn Museum, represented at the talk by Shelley Bernstein, Chief of Technology, can work the social media game to  interesting results.

As Shelley pointed out, if people identify with and are impressed by your brand, there’s a element of pride to checking into your space, and if they’re lucky, becoming its mayor.  For the social web crowd, that’s a bragging right! The Brooklyn Museum website has integrated a page that prominently displays the mayor (who’s rewarded with free membership), as well as those who’ve checked in lately and the quick tips they’ve left other users. The museum’s worked with Foursquare to develop a badge (BK Art Star!) users can earn. Foursquare co-founder Naveen Selvadurai was present to answer excited questions from the mostly nonprofit technologist crowd about where the network is going… and how best to ride the wave.




Photo by Howard Brier of Brooklyn




Is a virtual reward reward system with little monetary incentive significant in driving a museum’s membership? The Brooklyn Museum was careful not to overstate its metrics. However, every step an organization takes to thoughtfully improve the experience of the audience helps your brand become an important part of people’s lives. In this instance, the action is relatively inexpensive (Foursquare uses an open API). And as Channelisers believe, even better when you’re bridging the gap between your physical presence and your digital one!

Foursquare

Brooklyn Museum

More reading on nonprofits & Foursquare from Mashable

Looking back on Internet Week 2010! Part II.

June 22nd, 2010

This is part two of our rehash of Internet Week’s The  #Promise Conference!

Though we love topics with an environmentally-friendly slant, Channelise was most riveted by a more humanistic, empathic presentation by Jason Rzepka, Vice President of Public Affairs at MTV. The ambassador of teenage culture is using its influence to address very specific topics: sexting of the photographic variety and digital abuse. Stylized videos confronted us with the faces, voices, and stories of young people whose lives had been irreversibly damaged by digital media. We felt aching sorrow for the naïve victims and then dazzling hope that MTV was doing something about the problem… a very effective presentation, indeed. It ended with a soon-to-be-aired commercial of a pale, skinny teen having every digital insult he received tattooed on his body in gaping, black letters.

"Do you have digital drama?"

Adding a little celeb power of the day was Edward Norton, who spoke on behalf of Crowdrise, the social giving platform he created. The site allows fundraisers of all status to set up a page for their cause, encourage donation, and update followers on the project. This concept is catching on in a number of areas lately; read about it here, via Mashable.

We also heard from the COO of Charity: Water, Rod Arnold, who encouraged us to “give up” our birthdays in favor of asking friends and family to donate to the organization. Charity: Water claims that 100% of donations go to directly to projects that bring clean water to poverty-stricken populations. (Administrative costs come from other sponsorships.) The organization is unveiling a new media application that will let donors see exactly where each cent of their donation is spent, under the assumption that this level of transparency will encourage people to open their wallets. Now there’s a research topic!

It also brings a twist to our topic of the day. Douglas Rushkoff, author of the book Life, Inc. spoke on his philosophy, or rather, nonsupport, of corporations. Rushkoff believes that as corporations must please their stockholders, they can never work for the good of the world—no matter how many CSR programs they integrate. According to him, only private businesses can possibly create value with people.

See what we mean about PepsiCo allowing in some very opposing views? Of course, the conference sponsors was their audience, and the world at large, to consider that social and mobile media are big enough game-changers to hold corporations far more responsible, and empower consumers to demand positive environmental and social impacts. Yes, social media has changed everything. But is it enough to take on the corporation?

Life, Inc. on Amazon

Looking back on Internet Week 2010! Part I.

June 21st, 2010

This June saw Internet Week in NYC, a schedule of events for people making their living—or living their passion—in Internet-related pursuits. Channelise attended a conference called The #Promise about “corporate citizenship’s” use of social/mobile media to make socially and environmentally responsible impacts. The one-day conference generated multiple days of ideas for us. First, we’ll talk a little about how this relates to branding issues; tomorrow, we’ll get into some concepts that excited us.

The conference was free by application and put on by ThinkSocial & PepsiCo. Is there too much hypocrisy for a company that has arguably been detrimental to the health of the world’s populations and environment to hold a conference on corporate responsibility? Or would it be worth it if more major corporations followed suit, doing a small part to mitigate negative impacts? We think that nearly everyone in attendance came with a healthy skepticism that “corporate social responsibility (CSR)” practices are little more than marketing ploys to pacify consumers back into buying their products.

Naturally, any Tweet tagging the conference showed up on two large screen feeds on either side of the stage. A Brooklyn furniture company tweeted “#thepromise Pepsi should promise to stop repackaging tap water in plastic bottles made out of petroleum products from BP.” As it were, ideas like this were discussed and generated at the front of the room, while international sugary, fatty, and salty beverages and snacks were handed out in the back (we tried chorizo-flavored Lays from Venezuela; not terrible).

To PepsiCo’s credit, opposing arguments weren’t stifled or entirely high-fructose-corn-syrup-coated. The goal of the day was to explore ways to leverage social/mobile media toward corporate responsibility and have companies make “promises” to do so.

The Healthymagination site


Linda Boff, GE’s Global Director of Marketing Communications and Digital, freely admitted that GE engages in CSR practices because it’s good for their bottom line. It helps the company rebrand and reposition their products as better for the world. The company has created the “Healthymagination” brand to start to address global health care shortcomings with catchy videos they hope go viral. Though the media links back to GE’s website, it is not obviously branded as a part of the company.

GE has also de-engineered a few items in order to make them more useful for poorer, usually rural populations. A new line of “Lullaby Warmer” incubators includes a hand-crank operated version; it uses just a few minutes of hand-cranking to give a baby a space. A portable ultrasound machine helps bring diagnoses to far-flung locations for just $8K—traditional equipment can cost upwards of $20K. Sounds good to us.

With perhaps the most stark-sounding CSR-related title, we also heard from Timberland’s Senior Manager for Values Marketing, Margaret Morey-Reuner. Commendably, Timberland has jumpstarted a few interesting community involvement efforts, like City Year. However, in attendance at a Clinton Global Initiative yearly meeting, they were advised by the former President to hone their activities into one, strong effort. Being Timberland, they decided to plant trees. Soon, you’ll be able to visit their Facebook page and buy or gift virtual seeds, which will translate into the real thing, planted in devastatingly deforested places like Horqin, China. Their “#promise” is to plant five million trees in five years. The side company that will help carry out this effort, as well as spark creatively green product creation (soda tab purse, anyone?), is called Earthkeepers—and opposed to GE’s Healthymagination, it’s very closely branded to Timberland.

Soda Tab Bag - photo from Earthsaver.com

Which is a better approach? To tie doggedly your “mitigating” company with your corporation, or create a looser tether? Timberland’s Earthkeepers is more visible, so it’s easier to credit the corporation. Perhaps they also benefit from their ingrained appeal to those more Earth-minded. But GE’s projects are more behind the scenes, giving the company more of a martyred-mother status (you’ll never know how much I’ve done for you!). Of course, a successful branding strategy takes into account myriad factors, and the answer isn’t the same for every corporation. What’s important is that a corporate social reasonability policy does good, whether the company is profiting from it or not.

Side note: Speaking of basic branding, however, it’s interesting how often the simplest items are overlooked. Channelise couldn’t figure out why the conference producers didn’t decide on a hashtag format. On programs and presentations (and consequently, Tweets and write-ups) it was written both #thepromise and #promise. Since “#promise” is already tied to other topics on Twitter, it seems they should’ve stuck with a uniform “#thepromise” for this event.

ThinkSocial

Healthymagination

City Year

Clinton Global Initiative

Earthkeepers

The De-Oiling of Society

June 18th, 2010

Artists and designers are creating powerful BP parodies; bloggers and the vociferous social web is firing vitriol. Some argue the BP name won’t survive this catastrophe and that a possible name change or acquisition is expected down the line. BP gave us extra attack ammo with Ogilvy’s 200 million dollar Beyond Petroleum rebranding campaign from 2000. The once energizing green and yellow BP sunburst pallet has turned to dripping, oiled black and brown. And along with the 885 dead birds, 363 sea turtles and 44 dead mammals (and counting), Sponge Bob Square Pants has seen his last vibrant days at sea. Many New Yorkers are ready to take BP’s brand back from them, screaming “WE are Beyond Petroleum.”

Last week a group of 200 oil-sick New Yorkers came together for an informal strategy meeting, Responses to the Gulf Oil Spill: A Public Forum and Planning Meeting. The forum was organized by Greater NYC for Change, The New School, Sierra Club, and Democracy for NYC. Within two hours, we would conceive hundreds of ideas on how to take action to assist Gulf Coast communities in extreme distress and rally around direct government action and public education programs for a green energy economy.

We split up into distinct teams: creative and media gurus, lobbying aficionados, direct actors to support local Gulf volunteer efforts, and public educators to spread the facts about our environmental reality. From the hundreds of good ideas, I’ve cobbled together a few main concepts to present. These ideas have great potential to spur a wave of direct action from the grassroots level on up.

Oiled Central Park
Cover a sprawling portion of central park with a black tarp-like material. The tarp would say, “This tarp is one millionth of the total size of the Gulf oil spill.” The tarp could be a month-long installation, reminiscent of Christo and Jean-Claude’s beautifully, controversial public art. The tarp would also act as a community meeting space to hold energy education workshops, eco-theater productions, and organized protests for a green energy economy. At night the tarp could be turned over to reveal a white back and images of the Gulf Coast could be projected as not to forget its amazing beauty.

The GulfTruth Channel
As traditional journalists and photographers continue to struggle to gain access to the oil spill, we’re calling for the creation of a GulfTruth viral video channel. The website would act as the real BP camera, funneling videos and content from non-traditional bloggers, photographers, and citizens of the Gulf Coast — uncensored and uninterrupted. The website would integrate web applications that help people understand the magnitude of the spill such as the if it was my home app. A new application that equates the Gulf Coast water pollution to what it might feel and look like if it were air pollution might send an effective message to us land dwellers.

Oil Addiction 12 Step Program
Design of a 12 Step Oil Addition program that includes guidance of daily changes we need to make and how to take local action. The program would include a citywide campaign where thousands of New Yorkers would call into work “sick from oil”.

Responsible Farm Fishing Programs
There were also ideas to adopt a local Gulf coast community, such as jumpstarting a program to support responsible farming fisheries to help Gulf fisherman get back on their feet. This type of program would allow these communities to somewhat continue their way of life that has been passed down through generations. Although farm fishing operations are debatable, at this point all possible avenues should be considered that would allow communities to preserve their threatened heritage and livelihood.

The were also cheeky comments of turning P. Diddy’s famous White Party into the Black Oil Party, instead of Lollapalooza a Spillapalooza, and recruiting The Boss himself, Bruce Springsteen for an energy efficiency public service announcement. It was an amazing experience to collaborate with so many passionate and talented people and to propose of all kinds of solutions to a disturbingly complex problem. I can only hope that there are numerous groups around the country doing the same.

The graphic above illustrates that BP failed miserably to invest in safety.

Outlandish investment in branding can’t tame a PR disaster like this. There are lots of ways to get involved. Take part in hands across the sand and check out CodePink to participate in the July 19 day of action against BP. Stand up and take responsibility by participating in the de-oiling of our society—as really, aren’t we all to blame?

:: Lorri Meyers

Greater NYC for Change
The Tishman Environment and Design Center, The New School
Sierra Club New York
NYC Democracy for New York City

Komen & KFC for the Cure

April 29th, 2010

When I came across the blog chatter about Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s cause partnership with KFC, I thought I was reading an article from The Onion or an Ad Busters spoof ad! Yes, the KFC Colonel, skin now aglow in rosy pink, is touting pink buckets of overflowing chicken in an effort to educate women on the risks of breast cancer. 50 cents from every bucket sold at KFC will go towards breast cancer research. This program is estimated to raise over 8 million: the largest single donation to a breast cancer cause.

We can all feel something questionable about this brand association. According to Cancer.gov, “Weight gain during adulthood has been found to be the most consistent and strongest predictor of breast cancer risk in studies in which it has been examined.” Considering the big gaping dissonance between Komen, advocates fighting the second leading cause of death for women, at 22%, and KFC, grub that possibly causes heart disease, the leading cause of death for women, at 26%—What is KFC’s position on the health of their products?

In reference to Rob Walker’s Slate Magazine blog post: KFC is plunging forward with this campaign, giving no apparent thought to the possibility that some will find it preposterous. In a somewhat astonishing press release, the company says it intends to “educate the public” that “fried chicken can be part of a healthy, balanced diet”

Growing up consuming KFC as a monthly indulgence, and now as a brand professional, I believe this dishonest and dissociate KFC brand position is taking health claims too far and is simpleminded brand positioning. I confess, my childhood was littered with warm KFC experiences. I chomped on those crispy pieces of chicken lovingly. Did we think it was healthy? Certainly not! But that was the point. It was a mischievous dinner treat after a hard day’s work for the whole family. (Note: I no longer partake in this practice.)

I fear for the consumer that will swallow KFC’s claims to be a healthy part of their diet. KFC has made sound strategic brand choices in the past: moving away from their original name that bared the word Fried, posting nutrition facts, and producing ‘healthier’ grilled versions of their products. However, it’s not brand-wise to try to coerce people into thinking that KFC can be an integral part of a healthy lifestyle. I won’t even delve into the KFC business of raising chickens and the unnatural agricultural processes utilized that certainly aren’t healthy for the chickens, the workers, our environment, let alone anyone eating them.

Komen has planted their stake in the ground—they are aiming to be the leading nonprofit cause marketing organization in the world, but at what cost to their brand? What process does Komen use to vet their cause marketing partnerships? In this case, it doesn’t seem that they talked to their key target audience. This program has greatly eroded their brand promise and their biggest asset, their devoted community of precious brand supporters. We spoke with a nutritionist for breast cancer patients here in the city. She said that if the partnership weren’t so horrible, she’d laugh at it.

Although the 8.5 million projected donations is a monumental chunk of change for breast cancer research, I would love to know how breast cancer patients and survivors feel about this deal. Let’s invite these strong women to comment: how many pink buckets of chicken would you eat for the cure?

Social Impact Ventures: Life isn’t just for profit.

April 22nd, 2010

I stopped by New York Entrepreneur Week specifically to check out the panel Social Entrepreneurship: Life isn’t Just For-Profit. The panel discussion was about the new role of social enterprises in the economy. Everyone on the panel had experienced a moment where they chose to spend their lives doing business that makes a BIG social impact.

Rachael Chung of Catchafire created her startup idea after searching for a non-profit to volunteer her investment banking and finance skills. Perplexed that she couldn’t find an NGO to donate her talent to, but knowing the need was out there, she started Catchafire. It’s a for-profit online venture that matches non-profit organizations to skills-based volunteers. Everyone benefits; the non-profit pays a low $100 dollar fee for each project match, and the volunteer gains experience and contacts. Rachael talked about how there are over 1 million NGOs and that 95% of them need skills-based volunteers. 75% have under $500,000 annual budgets, and 50% have under $250,000 annual budgets. Most have a tiny staff of only 1 – 5 employees. Catchafire will launch this summer to fill need of nonprofits to free up time so employees can focus on who they serve instead of marketing and fundraising efforts.

Garrett Gravesen, Co-Founder of Global L.E.A.D., has established the “peacecore of the 21st century.” Garrett’s moment came when he studied abroad in Africa; a little boy in an orphanage asked when he was coming back. That instant Garrett knew that his life wouldn’t be the same. He wanted to give other students opportunities to experience the same moment he did. With 50% of US students gaining study abroad experience in only four Western European countries, Garrett sees a big opportunity to change this equation. He’s seeking more sustainable ways to fund his organization, but for now, they subsist on donations and creative fundraising events.

A very successful and design-centric social venture model is FEED Projects. Kristina Fell talked about the FEED Project’s hybrid model; they are a both a foundation and a for-profit bag venture. The for-profit FEED Project bags create a sustainable steam of funding for their foundation. They have partnerships with food and fashion brands like Whole Foods and Bergdorf Goodman. So far, FEED Project has provided over 50 million meals.

Michael Karnjanaprakorn is changing the funding and investment model for social ventures. He started a social venture fund called All Day Buffet based on the Presumed Abundance model. They invest in social driven ventures, most notably the corporate social innovation consultancy Lovely Day. The consultancy innovates corporate giving programs and measures social impact ROI for global brand. They worked with Pepsi to establish the Pepsi Refresh Project.

The panel left me not only inspired about the potential social impact of Channelise clients It also provoked a lot of thought about whether new organizations wanting to make a social impact run best as for-profit, non-profit, or some other as-of-yet undetermined classification. With the right amount of inspiration and careful planning, and in reaction to our changing economy, I think we’ll see a lot more creative and successful social impact ventures in the coming years!

Project Design H Road Show: Design that empowers people

March 26th, 2010

Emily Pilloton, founder of Project H Design stopped by Pratt University yesterday as part of her 75 day, 35 school cross-country road tour in a beautiful vintage airstream trailer. The airstream is perfectly curated with 40 of the 100 socially conscious products showcased in her new book (Design Revolution: 100 Products that Empower People) like The XO One Laptop Per Child that has already changed the way we thinking about opening access to learning technologies around the world.

The talk at Pratt Institute was an invigorating discussion on how design professionals can influence the way design is thought about globally starting with education. To go along with the exhibit, Project H Design has created a Design Revolution Toolkit, which serves as a sort of working manifesto that empowers us all to rethink the processes we use conducting business. It gives you active suggestion on how to practice design as a tool for social impact. Some key points are; design with the users not for them, don’t reinvent the wheel, and empower, heal, and catalyze.

One of the most enlightening parts of our conversation was the reading of Victor Papanek’s quote from his 1985 book, Design for the Real World he writes: “As long as design concerns itself with confecting trivial ‘toys for adults,’ killing machines with gleaming tailfins, and ’sexed-up’ shrouds for typewriters, toasters, telephones, and computers, it has lost all reason to exist.” Papanek was one of the first to question the over-commercialization of design and think of the designers’ role as a supporter for cultural and social change. Fortunately, the industry has finally starting to catch up to Victor’s thinking.

Next year Emily and her partner Matt are off to teach high school in Bertie Country, North Carolina. Here they will teach design thinking and applied design arts and spread the design philosophy throughout some of our most needed communities. This program, amongst many others, are amazing examples of how people can create massive change on both local and national levels. Other prime examples of organizations imbedded into communities to impact social change are the Rural Studio at the School of Architecture at Auburn University in Alabama, and Energize Clinton County in Ohio. These are exciting examples of how business, design, and social policy come together to educate and create jobs to design a better future to empower communities.

Green Drinks and Gas Drilling

March 16th, 2010

Last week we attended our first Green Drinks NYC event at the HIRO Ballroom. Green Drinks NYC is a local network of sustainability-minded professionals that meet to make new connections and share information. Upon entering the event we were greeted by a small group of protesters. The protest was in response to the NRDC’s (Natural Resources Defense Council) presentation on the controversial Marcellus Shale gas drilling in New York State. The NRDC is working with leaders across the state to ensure that if drilling in the Marcellus Shale occurs in New York, it will be done responsibly and only in appropriate areas. It seemed that the protestors aren’t convinced they weren’t doing all they can! Environmental advocates want to make absolutely sure that New Yorkers aren’t harmed by the harsh environmental effects of the ‘hydraulic fracturing’ process which pushes “millions of gallons of chemical water deep underground to pry out gas that’s locked away in tight spaces.” This complex fracking chemical cocktail might greatly harm our environment and end up in our drinking water supplies. Go NRDC! I’ll take my water sans fracking fluid please.

Design & Genomics: Bio-products of the future

March 9th, 2010

This week we popped into Dutch designer’s JORIS LAARMAN LAB exhibit at the Friedman Benda Gallery in Chelsea. His exhibit was fascinating! I left astonished by the great potential for more innovative collaborations with designers and scientists to change the way we live; creating a totally new type of genomic-designed products for our everyday use.

One of the most thought provoking pieces at the exhibit was titled IN VITRO. With the appearance of a miniature, traditional light fixture, it looks like something your parents might have had in their den–it has a simple metal base and cream lampshade. Its departure from normal lamp-dom is that it’s encased in a double-lined glass capsule with a tube structure attached, hinting at the amazing experiment behind this lamp The lamp’s glow was created with half living material and half non-living material. The living material in the lampshade originates from a Chinese hamster’s ovarian cell culture dating back to 1957. In 1990, this cell line was augmented with a firefly’s luciferase gene. This luciferase gene is what causes the bioluminescent glow of a firefly. Laarman and a team of scientists from the University of Twente and Leiden University created a self-sustaining half light lamp that relies on engineered-nature rather than the use of carbon-laden natural resources.

Watch a video of the lamp glowing here.

IN VITRO’s design begs the question of how designers and scientists can foster innovation to create bio-designed objects. This type of collaborative design thinking could revolutionize how we design and use everyday products. Could these bio-engineered marvels create a whole new world of sustainable, green products? Could using “the beauty and efficiency of biological growth” lead to using less of our precious natural resources — solving some our most critical environmental and economic problems of today? Until then, I’ll dream of reading Kafka’s Metamorphosis by the light of my bedside half life lamp.

National Design Week: Design in Business

October 19th, 2009

Today I attended a National Design Week event titled Design in Business at TheTimesCenter in New York City. The program debated the role of design thinking in organizations. The expert panel was a healthy mix of views from academia, with Professor Jeanne Liedtka (University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business), corporate America, Sam Lucente (VP of Design, HP) and design leaders, Bill Moggridge (2009 Lifetime Achievement National Design Award Winner, co-founder of IDEO) with author, Daniel Pink as moderator (A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future).

businessofdesign

Bill Moggenridge simplified the sometimes misunderstood term ‘design thinking’ as being the overlap of technology (Silicon Valley), business (factors, VC’s) and people (observations, design). Bill explained how the power of design thinking is in the collaboration of multidisciplinary teams of specialists in each of the three areas. The collective chemistry of these teams that have an amazing ability to capture a larger collective IQ together than as individual thinkers.

The most exciting idea that emerged from the talk was the notion that design thinking and creativity is almost non-existent in American K-12 education. Bill spoke about the use of design programs in UK schools high schools and that students were achieving great success in industrial design projects rivaling prestigious American Universities. He also told the success story about the lack of integration of design thinking in Universities which led to the creation of Tom Kelley’s Stanford D School. As the debate went on Bill had a very good idea — that institutions like the Smithsonian along with leading design organizations like DMI (Design Management Institute), AIGA (American Institute of Graphic Arts), IDSA (Industrial Designers Society of America), IXDA (Interaction Design Association), et cetera, should come together and take the lead in advocating and creating a platform for design education in American schools.

Jeanne Liedtka agreed that teaching design thinking and creativity would be extremely beneficial but since most people have a lack of understanding of what design thinking is we should challenge ourselves to define a tangible set of design thinking skills that could be developed in a formal education setting. Below are my initial thoughts on areas a K-12 curriculum could focus for students to thrive in the 21st century innovation economy:

  • Observation (The ability to observe and collect insights from diverse experiences and data)
  • Critical Thinking/Analysis and Insight (The ability to determine specific insights through analysis of data and and experiences to create knowledge)
  • Creative Thinking/Idea Generation (The ability to generate an influx of creative and innovative ideas)
  • Communication: Auditory & Non-Verbal (The ability to be sensitive, well-rounded, successful communicators)
  • Visualization (The ability to translate ideas into easily understandable visual formats)
  • Social Intelligence (The ability to thrive and learn in collaborative environments and different cultures)

I look forward to talking to design, business and education professionals about how we can work together to create a new design thinking movement in K-12 schools.

Welcome to Channelise!

October 16th, 2009

Welcome to Channelise Blog!

We hope to share a few of our weekly thoughts and experiences on design strategy and innovation. We encourage you to drop us a note to say hello or please feel free to give us your feedback and insights on our website and blog posts.

Good Design Good Business

Thank you!


Cheers,
Channelise